How was it in the olden days? Its called having a laugh flower

I think her last customer left it there

Bit of both i reckon

Just seen this shit and fuck you, your not even blond and make fun of everyone that dies that isn’t blonde

I told you that I am light blonde with light brown, I don't have to call you bitch

U still have fucking brown in ur hair dipshit, talk shit when u have FULL blonde hair

This kind of response does not address the idea being discussed, but instead diverts attention by attacking the speaker based on their appearance or physical traits. This falls into the logical fallacy known as Ad Hominem.
In this fallacy, the actual argument is completely ignored, and the focus shifts toward insulting or belittling the speaker, as if the truth of an idea depends on the way the person looks rather than the logic or substance of what they’re saying.

This approach also involves the Tu Quoque fallacy (“you too”), in which a viewpoint is dismissed simply because the speaker supposedly lacks a particular trait or fails to meet a personal standard.
This is a clear logical error, because the validity of an idea has nothing to do with who says it, but rather with its intellectual strength and objective content.

Thus, judging the truth of an opinion based on the person instead of the idea itself is a deviation from sound reasoning—substituting logic with bias, and content with appearance.

Judging ideas based on the speaker’s appearance or personal characteristics may include superficial factors such as:
    •    Hair or skin color
    •    Physical appearance
    •    Clothing
    •    Social status or age
    •    Class, religious, or ethnic affiliation
    •    Or any other trait irrelevant to the truth of the argument

None of these are logical criteria for determining what is true or false—they only serve to distract and derail from the core of the discussion.

If you were aware that your response was illogical, perhaps it was driven by a moment of emotion or sudden anger.
I hope you’ll be able to manage your reactions more thoughtfully in the future, and keep the conversation focused on ideas—not on people.

<a href='../user/Lvtkse'>@Lvtkse Wow, it seems that you even take everything seriously in a place where everyone is a racist sadist and that's good, bitch, and you use an (IA) to write a text, it's obvious that I do it to piss that bitch off because I don't think you take the time to write something that in itself was an insult with valid bases.

Next time, expect it as well—because logic prefers to strike people like you, just as it does with racists.

You're just giving me the impression that you don't have your own criteria and you resort to using AI to respond, pathetic.

a comment that stirs nothing and answers nothing, Give another answer

@El tio loco, shut the fuck up nigga

Seriously, I'm asking you to reason why the majority of black-haired women deserve it because the majority of people are sluts and screamers, they always want to be right or they don't even know how to drive properly and worse, they are very easy to manipulate and deceive because you think that the majority of gore videos of Mexicans are pure black-haired women who do not keep their deal but never a blonde because they know that they are pests, there is a reason for human trafficking in Latin America through Mexico and Colombia, all of them are foreigners with blondes or redheads, pathetic why are you complaining that I am reasonable about something but my practice only diverts the topic, be happy bitch

1. “Women with black hair are prostitutes and loud”:
This is a fallacious generalization. There is no logical or realistic connection between hair color and human behavior.
A woman may engage in wrongful behavior due to real reasons such as:
    •    Poverty,
    •    Psychological pressure,
    •    Forced marriage,
    •    Or harsh upbringing.
The same applies to men. Morality has no color or shape.

2. “They always want to be right or don’t know how to lead”:
This is a personal fallacy and gender bias. Leadership depends on training and experience, not on gender or appearance. The desire to prove one’s point is a shared human trait, not exclusive to women.

3. “It’s easy to manipulate and deceive them”:
Exploitation often occurs due to ignorance, lack of education, necessity, or difficult social circumstances — not because of hair color.
A girl raised in a safe and educated environment is hard to manipulate, regardless of her hair color.

4. “Most of the violent clips feature women with black hair”:
The reason is simple: in countries like Mexico and Colombia, the majority of the population has black hair, so they naturally appear more in such clips — not because they are targeted for their hair.
Violence there results from:
    •    Weak states,
    •    Control of gangs,
    •    And human trafficking.
The victims can be of any color or shape.

5. “Blondes know they are pests and maintain deals”:
This is clear discrimination, based on false ideas and misconceptions. Hair color doesn’t make someone more loyal or intelligent. Loyalty is tied to values, not genes.

6. “The reason for human trafficking in Latin America is blondes”:
This is wrong. The reason for human trafficking is poverty, corruption, and lack of law enforcement. Victims come in all colors.
Traffickers target the weakest, not “blondes” or “blacks.” The perpetrators exploit circumstances, not colors.

⸻

“You’re just claiming to be rational without providing any evidence to support your claims.”